http://www.bing.com:80/search?q=Ethical+Problems+Examples搜索结果http://www.bing.com:80/s/a/rsslogo.gifhttp://www.bing.com:80/search?q=Ethical+Problems+Examples版权所有 © 2026 Microsoft。保留所有权利。不得以任何方式或出于任何目的使用、复制或传输这些 XML 结果，除非出于个人的非商业用途在 RSS 聚合器中呈现必应结果。对这些结果的任何其他使用都需要获得 Microsoft Corporation 的明确书面许可。一经访问此网页或以任何方式使用这些结果，即表示您同意受上述限制的约束。https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/121614/is-it-ethical-to-break-a-law-even-if-it-is-to-do-the-right-thingA better example is probably: would it have been ethical for someone in 1940s Germany to illegally hide Jews to protect them from being killed by Nazi officers. Most people today would (hopefully) say "yes". Murder has its own ethical objections distinct from the law, and opinions on current and upcoming presidents vary wildly, which distracts from the core question.周日, 22 3月 2026 20:39:00 GMThttps://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/297/what-if-anything-is-the-difference-between-ethics-and-moral-philosophyIt refers to specific controversial social or legal issues, such as nuclear war, animal rights, capital punishment, abortion, and so on. The goal there is to apply the ethical principles established in the abstract world of moral philosophy to specific real-world problems.周四, 02 4月 2026 21:23:00 GMThttps://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/99090/virtue-ethics-approach-to-the-trolley-problemThis teaches philosophy students to approach ethical questions as a bounded problem, with certain outcomes, not to exercise imagination upon them, to treat humans as abstractions without empathy, and to applaud themselves for advocating for decisions that harm others. Every aspect of this degrades the moral VIRTUE in the student.周二, 31 3月 2026 05:05:00 GMThttps://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/107202/what-are-valid-rebuttals-to-utilitarianismThose arguments often involve examples that are very extreme and completely detached from reality, which doesn't mean it's a bad principle for non-extremes. People like to consider utilitarianism in isolation, but we should ask how it compares to other moral philosophies.周五, 27 3月 2026 05:53:00 GMThttps://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/61349/what-are-some-realistic-situations-where-kantian-ethics-can-be-appliedKant's ethics applies to all situations in which somebody does an intentional action. So looking for a range of 'realistic' - real life, true to life, matter of fact, everyday, &c. - situations to which it applies misses its totally general applicability. It is relevant right across the piece. No intentional action escapes its scope. Time to bring things down to ground level. Suppose you want ...周三, 25 3月 2026 20:36:00 GMThttps://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/90042/what-are-the-arguments-against-moral-subjectivismAre there cogent arguments for moral subjectivism? Although people might conflate their own desires with the supposed will of God, still, defining morality relative to God at least means defining it intersubjectively. Beyond that, Mackie has described the very concept of moral facts/properties as "objectively prescriptive": he argues that such things are too "weird" to exist in our world, but ...周一, 23 3月 2026 00:28:00 GMThttps://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/26508/what-ethical-problems-might-be-involved-in-time-travelI don't see how this answers the question about the ethics of time travel. Perhaps that these ethical questions don't matter because other events will balance any change the time traveler might effect? Specific references to Novikov or others would be useful.周六, 04 4月 2026 01:33:00 GMThttps://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/121415/can-a-rational-decision-ever-be-regrettedBut is that really possible? From the same article: Decision theory underlies game theory because a game’s solution identifies rational choices in the decision problems the game creates for the players. Solutions to games distinguish correlation and causation, as do decision principles Let's understand CDT for what it is.周五, 20 3月 2026 01:08:00 GMThttps://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/50288/how-can-religious-faith-be-epistemically-justifiedThat way, the ethical norms of a society can be adjusted by public debate. If the faith you choose leads to a choice of ethical values, there is nothing wrong with that. But the problem begins if one uses religious claims as a public justification of ethical values.周五, 20 3月 2026 01:29:00 GMThttps://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/24083/what-is-the-meaning-of-there-are-questions-that-science-cant-answerYour question seems to concern the use of such arguments to promote religious or magical thinking. Indeed religion often attempts to answer metaphysical and ethical questions, and this is the kind of questions science doesn't directly answer (for the reasons mentioned above: they are implied in the very foundations of science).周一, 30 3月 2026 12:37:00 GMT